Search for: "MIRANDA P RODRIGUEZ"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2019, 4:38 am
COMUNICADO COMISIÓN ESPECIAL PARA LA ELECCIÓN DE MIEMBROS DE LA JNJ PUBLICA LA LISTA DE POSTULANTES VÁLIDAMENTE INSCRITOS La Comisión Especial cumple con la publicación de la lista de los postulantes válidamente inscritos, de acuerdo con los plazos establecidos en el cronograma del Concurso Público de Méritos para la selección de miembros de la Junta Nacional de Justicia. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 5:48 am
Rivera Miranda: Juez Municipal (nuevo ingreso) Lcda. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 9:48 pm
Will Judge Jose Rodriguez decide to retire and take Madonna up on her offer to cut a duet CD whilst both are wearing their infamous dueling head-pieces? [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
” [via Lexisone] Manuel Antonio Rodriguez v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Miranda, 133 S.W.3d 217, 226 (Tex. 2004). [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Miranda, 133 S.W.3d 217, 226 (Tex. 2004). [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
LEXIS 1731 (FL 10/14/2010) On post-conviction appeal, relief denied on “four guilt-phase ineffective assistance of counsel claims, asserting that counsel was ineffective due to his (a) failure to adequately communicate with Everett; (b) failure to adequately present Everett‘s Miranda argument at the pretrial suppression hearing; (c) failure to adequately challenge forensic serological evidence and object to an unqualified witness opining on that evidence; and (d) failure… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:01 am
Rodriguez-Lopez, 565 F.3d 312 (U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
Rose, Thomas P. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Green, No. 06-2468 Conviction for distribution of cocaine is vacated and remanded for a new trial where: 1) the written statement of a confidential informant naming defendant as the person who had sold him drugs in a controlled buy was hearsay and not subject to an exception as a present-sense impression; 2) the prosecution could not use in its case-in-chief as substantive evidence the responses and reactions of defendant upon seeing a video purporting to depict him selling drugs, when the showing… [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am
Rose, Thomas P. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
NEWEST ADDITION TO HECHT COURT'S IMMUNITY JURIS(MAL)PRUDENCE: DRUNK DRIVER IMMUNITY Here is yet another example of the Texas Supreme Court's penchant for creating and invoking immunity theories to deny plaintiffs their day in court against a party that caused injury, and thereby preventing a trial on the merits and recovery of damages from the tortfeasor proven to have committed the tort. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
P. 605, and this evidence was prejudicial to defendant. [read post]
